tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7988870184363644257.post85340901116416538..comments2023-10-26T04:49:17.512-07:00Comments on Perpetua of Carthage: SF Archbishop Can't Stop Teens from Performing Gay PlayPerpetuahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16632860530530786486noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7988870184363644257.post-11847916714315399712009-03-13T07:32:00.000-07:002009-03-13T07:32:00.000-07:00Kendall Harmon at T19 posted this thread for use a...Kendall Harmon at T19 posted <A HREF="http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/article/15453/" REL="nofollow">this thread</A> for use as counter-arguments to the shellfish argument. <BR/><BR/>"Leviticus is against same sex practice, but Leviticus says we should not eat shellfish. So how could we possibly listen to Leviticus?"<BR/><BR/>"As for the case itself, it falls apart quickly once you quote the summary of the law which still is used in many rite I services in the Episcopal Church and it ends… <BR/><BR/>'you shall love your neighbor as yourself' <BR/><BR/>which is of course a quote from… <BR/><BR/>LEVITICUS! <BR/><BR/>So the trouble is that there are continuities and discontinuities between the two testaments, and simply pointing out that there is a discontinuity in the area of specfic food practice, doesn’t mean that in the area of teaching sexual morality there isn’t a continuity. Leviticus is also powerfully against lying. Indeed, much of it is an extended and important commentary on the ten commandments. So is the teaching on sexuality like shellfish or is it like lying or 'loving your neighbor as yourself'"?<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://net.bible.org/verse.php?book=Lev&chapter=19&verse=18" REL="nofollow">(Leviticus 18:19)</A>Undergroundpewsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10182191422663119484noreply@blogger.com